A multiple classifier system for early melanoma diagnosis

  • Authors:
  • Andrea Sboner;Claudio Eccher;Enrico Blanzieri;Paolo Bauer;Mario Cristofolini;Giuseppe Zumiani;Stefano Forti

  • Affiliations:
  • ITC-irst, Centre for Scientific and Technological Research, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento 38050, Italy;ITC-irst, Centre for Scientific and Technological Research, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento 38050, Italy;Department of Information and Communication Technology, University of Trento, Via Sommarive 14, Povo, Trento 38050, Italy;Department of Dermatology, S. Chiara Hospital, L.go Medaglie d'Oro 8, Trento 38100, Italy;Lega per la Lotta contro i Tumori, Sezione Trentina, Corso 3 Novembre 134, Trento 38100, Italy;Department of Dermatology, S. Chiara Hospital, L.go Medaglie d'Oro 8, Trento 38100, Italy;ITC-irst, Centre for Scientific and Technological Research, Via Sommarive 18, Povo, Trento 38050, Italy

  • Venue:
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Melanoma is the most dangerous skin cancer and early diagnosis is the key factor in its successful treatment. Well-trained dermatologists reach a diagnosis via visual inspection, and reach sensitivity and specificity levels of about 80%. Several computerised diagnostic systems were reported in the literature using different classification algorithms. In this paper, we will illustrate a novel approach by which a suitable combination of different classifiers is used in order to improve the diagnostic performances of single classifiers. We used three different kinds of classifiers, namely linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) and a decision tree, the inputs of which are 38 geometric and colorimetric features automatically extracted from digital images of skin lesions. Multiple classifiers were generated by combining the diagnostic outputs of single classifiers with appropriate voting schemata. This approach was evaluated on a set of 152 digital skin images. We compared the performances of multiple classifiers (2- and 3-classifier groups) between them and with respect to single ones (1-classifier group). We further compared the classifiers' performances with those of eight dermatologists. Classifiers' performances were measured in terms of distance from the ideal classifier. Compared with 1- and 2-classifier groups, performances of 3-classifier systems were significantly higher (P