Towards a Formalisation of Electronic Contracting Environments
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV
Argument Theory Change: Revision Upon Warrant
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
On the Acceptability of Meta-arguments
WI-IAT '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02
Combining statistics and arguments to compute trust
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Moving Between Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we extend the traditional Dung argumentation framework with cardinality constraints over the set of warranted arguments. This results in a new definition for argumentation semantics wherein arguments within an extension are both in some sense consistent and compliant with the constraints imposed on the system. After discussing the theoretical aspects of such a resource-bounded argumentation framework we describe its utility via an application to a concrete application domain: the scheduling of demand responsive transport.