Stable extensions in timed argumentation frameworks

  • Authors:
  • Maria Laura Cobo;Diego C. Martinez;Guillermo R. Simari

  • Affiliations:
  • Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Laboratory (LIDIA), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Bs. As., Argentina;Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Laboratory (LIDIA), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Bs. As., Argentina;Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Laboratory (LIDIA), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Bs. As., Argentina

  • Venue:
  • TAFA'11 Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A Timed Abstract Argumentation Framework is a novel formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, which is defined for every individual argument. Thus, the attainability of attacks and defenses is related to time, and the outcome of the framework may vary accordingly. In this work we study the notion of stable extensions applied to timed-arguments. The framework is extended to include intermittent arguments, which are available with some repeated interruptions in time.