Flexible protocol specification and execution: applying event calculus planning using commitments
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 2
IEEE Internet Computing
Diagnostic reasoning with A-Prolog
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Contextualizing commitment protocol
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Representing and reasoning about commitments in business processes
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Commitment tracking via the reactive event calculus
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Commitment-based protocols with behavioral rules and correctness properties of MAS
DALT'10 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Declarative agent languages and technologies VIII
Social commitments in time: satisfied or compensated
DALT'09 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies
A retrospective on the reactive event calculus and commitment modeling language
DALT'11 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper investigates the use of high-level action languages for representing and reasoning about commitments in multi-agent domains. We introduce the language Lmt, an extension of the language L, with new features motivated by the problem of representing and reasoning about commitments. The paper demonstrates how features and properties of commitments can be described in this action language. We show how Lmt can handle both simple commitment actions as well as complex commitment protocols. Furthermore, the semantics of Lmt provides a uniform solution to different problems in reasoning about commitments such as the problem of (i) verifying whether an agent fails (or succeeds) to deliver on its commitments; (ii) identifying pending commitments; and (iii) suggesting ways to satisfy pending commitments.