Comparing six modeling approaches

  • Authors:

  • Gunter Mussbacher;Wisam Al Abed;Omar Alam;Shaukat Ali;Antoine Beugnard;Valentin Bonnet;Rolv Bræk;Alfredo Capozucca;Betty H. C. Cheng;Urooj Fatima;Robert France;Geri Georg;Nicolas Guelfi;Paul Istoan;Jean-Marc Jézéquel;Jörg Kienzle;Jacques Klein;Jean-Baptiste Lézoray;Somayeh Malakuti;Ana Moreira;An Phung-Khac;Lucy Troup

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Canada;Software Engineering Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Software Engineering Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Simula Research Laboratory, Norway;Département Informatique, TELECOM Bretagne, France;Software Engineering Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Department of Telematics, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway;LASSY Research Team, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg;Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University;Department of Telematics, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway;Computer Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins;Computer Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins;LASSY Research Team, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg;LASSY Research Team, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg and ISC Department, CRP Gabriel Lippmann, Luxembourg;INRIA, Centre Rennes --- Bretagne Atlantique, Rennes, France;Software Engineering Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Laboratory for Advanced Software Systems, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg;Département Informatique, TELECOM Bretagne, France;Software Engineering Group, University of Twente, The Netherlands;Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal;Département Informatique, TELECOM Bretagne, France;Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

  • Venue:
  • MODELS'11 Proceedings of the 2011th international conference on Models in Software Engineering
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

While there are many aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) approaches, from requirements to low-level design, it is still difficult to compare them and know under which conditions different approaches are most applicable. This comparison, however, is crucially important to unify existing AOM and more traditional object-oriented modeling (OOM) approaches and to generalize individual approaches into a comprehensive end-to-end method. Such a method does not yet exist. This paper reports on work done at the inaugural Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive methodologies: (i) a common, focused case study for six modeling approaches, (ii) a set of criteria applied to each of the six approaches, and (iii) the assessment results.