Automated analysis of requirement specifications
ICSE '97 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering
AbstFinder, A Prototype Natural Language Text Abstraction Finder for Use in Requirements Elicitation
Automated Software Engineering
Market research for requirements analysis using linguistic tools
Requirements Engineering
Quality Analysis of NL Requirements: An Industrial Case Study
RE '05 Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering
Advancing Candidate Link Generation for Requirements Tracing: The Study of Methods
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Identifying Nocuous Ambiguities in Natural Language Requirements
RE '06 Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
Reducing Ambiguities in Requirements Specifications Via Automatically Created Object-Oriented Models
Innovations for Requirement Analysis. From Stakeholders' Needs to Formal Designs
On the Effectiveness of Abstraction Identification in Requirements Engineering
RE '10 Proceedings of the 2010 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
On human analyst performance in assisted requirements tracing: Statistical analysis
RE '11 Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference
REFSQ'13 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality
The state of the art in automated requirements elicitation
Information and Software Technology
Is knowledge power? the role of knowledge in automated requirements elicitation
CAiSE'13 Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
[Context and Motivation] This paper notes the advanced state of the natural language (NL) processing art and considers four broad categories of tools for processing NL requirements documents. These tools are used in a variety of scenarios. The strength of a tool for a NL processing task is measured by its recall and precision. [Question/Problem] In some scenarios, for some tasks, any tool with less than 100% recall is not helpful and the user may be better off doing the task entirely manually. [Principal Ideas/Results] The paper suggests that perhaps a dumb tool doing an identifiable part of such a task may be better than an intelligent tool trying but failing in unidentifiable ways to do the entire task. [Contribution] Perhaps a new direction is needed in research for RE tools.