Inhibition and young children's performance on the Tower of London task

  • Authors:
  • Frank D. Baughman;Richard P. Cooper

  • Affiliations:
  • School of Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK;School of Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK

  • Venue:
  • Cognitive Systems Research
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Young children, when performing problem solving tasks, show a tendency to break task rules and produce incomplete solutions. We propose that this tendency can be explained by understanding problem solving within the context of the development of ''executive functions'' - general cognitive control functions, which serve to regulate the operation of the cognitive system. This proposal is supported by the construction of two computational models that simulate separately the performance of 3-4 year old and 5-6 year old children on the Tower of London planning task. We seek in particular to capture the emerging role of inhibition in the older group. The basic framework within which the models are developed is derived from Fox and Das' Domino model [Fox, J., & Das, S. (2000). Safe and sound: Artificial intelligence in hazardous applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press] and Norman and Shallice's [Norman, D.A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and Self Regulation (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum] theory of willed and automatic action. Two strategies and a simple perceptual bias are implemented within the models and comparisons between model and child performance reveal a good fit for the key dependent measures (number of rule breaks and percentage of incomplete solutions) of the two groups.