An aspiration-level interactive model for multiple criteria decision making
Computers and Operations Research - Special issue: implementing multiobjective optimization methods: behavioral and computational issues
A new approach for multiple objective decision making
Computers and Operations Research
Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights
Computers and Operations Research
A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis
Computers and Operations Research
Using a benchmark in case-based multiple-criteria ranking
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans
An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making
Mathematical and Computer Modelling: An International Journal
Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country
Mathematical and Computer Modelling: An International Journal
Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
Mathematical and Computer Modelling: An International Journal
Hi-index | 0.98 |
A distance approach based on extreme points, or predefined ideal and anti-ideal points, is proposed to improve on the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Performance [or Ordered Preference] by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method of multiple criteria ranking. Two case studies demonstrate how the analysis procedure works, and provide a basis for comparison of the proposed method to the original TOPSIS and similar methods. In applications, the new method produces results that are generally consistent with the original technique, but offers new features such as a clear interpretation of extreme points, more flexibility in setting extreme points, no normalization distortion, and the ability to handle non-monotonic criteria.