IPSense: multi-paradigm routing for wireless sensor network
CoNEXT '05 Proceedings of the 2005 ACM conference on Emerging network experiment and technology
HCDD: hierarchical cluster-based data dissemination in wireless sensor networks with mobile sink
Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computing
Using event detection latency to evaluate the coverage of a wireless sensor network
Computer Communications
DAR: An energy-balanced data-gathering scheme for wireless sensor networks
Computer Communications
Climate and Biological Sensor Network
SAMOS '08 Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation
BoSS: a moving strategy for mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks
International Journal of Sensor Networks
A cooperative transmission scheme for cluster based wireless sensor networks
ICIC'09 Proceedings of the Intelligent computing 5th international conference on Emerging intelligent computing technology and applications
Dynamic election-based sensing and routing in wireless sensor networks
GLOBECOM'09 Proceedings of the 28th IEEE conference on Global telecommunications
AST/UCMA/ISA/ACN'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Advances in computer science and information technology
Dynamic channel allocation for dynamic spectrum use in wireless sensor networks
MILCOM'06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE conference on Military communications
A novel broadcasting algorithm for wireless sensor networks
ISPA'06 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing and Applications
Receiver oriented trajectory based forwarding
EURO-NGI'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Wireless Systems and Network Architectures in Next Generation Internet
| Hi-index | 0.25 |
When compared with now classical MANETs, sensor networks have different characteristics, and present different design and engineering challenges. One of the main aspects of sensor networks is that the solutions tend to be very application-specific. For this reason, a layered view like the one used in OSI imposes a large penalty, and implementations more geared toward the particular are desirable. This survey presents the three main paradigms for communication in ad hoc networks and discusses their applicability for routing, querying, and discovery. We conclude that the node-centric approach, although the oldest and best understood, is not the most appropriate for large-size low-energy application-specific sensor networks.