Partition Testing Does Not Inspire Confidence (Program Testing)
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Analyzing Partition Testing Strategies
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
On the Expected Number of Failures Detected by Subdomain Testing and Random Testing
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Choosing a testing method to deliver reliability
ICSE '97 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering
On random and partition testing
Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis
Evaluating Testing Methods by Delivered Reliability
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Partition Testing vs. Random Testing: The Influence of Uncertainty
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
On Comparisons of Random, Partition, and Proportional Partition Testing
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Comparing Partition and Random Testing via Majorization and Schur Functions
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
ECSQ '02 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Quality
Integrating Approximation Methods with the Generalized Proportional Sampling Strategy
APSEC '99 Proceedings of the Sixth Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference
Test Case Design Based on Z and the Classification-Tree Method
ICFEM '97 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods
ISSTA '04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis
On the analytical comparison of testing techniques
ISSTA '04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis
QSIC '04 Proceedings of the Quality Software, Fourth International Conference
Adaptive Random Testing Through Dynamic Partitioning
QSIC '04 Proceedings of the Quality Software, Fourth International Conference
On the Testing of Particular Input Conditions
COMPSAC '04 Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference - Volume 01
An extended fault class hierarchy for specification-based testing
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
Automatic generation of test cases from Boolean specifications using the MUMCUT strategy
Journal of Systems and Software
An empirical analysis and comparison of random testing techniques
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering
Adaptive random testing through iterative partitioning revisited
Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Software quality assurance
Decimal floating-point in z9: an implementation and testing perspective
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Experimental assessment of random testing for object-oriented software
Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Software testing and analysis
On Comparing Testing Criteria for Logical Decisions
Ada-Europe '09 Proceedings of the 14th Ada-Europe International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies
Normalized restricted random testing
Ada-Europe'03 Proceedings of the 8th Ada-Europe international conference on Reliable software technologies
Adaptive random testing by bisection with restriction
ICFEM'05 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Formal Methods and Software Engineering
ASIAN'04 Proceedings of the 9th Asian Computing Science conference on Advances in Computer Science: dedicated to Jean-Louis Lassez on the Occasion of His 5th Cycle Birthday
Adaptive random testing by bisection and localization
FATES'05 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Formal Approaches to Software Testing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Weyuker and Jeng have investigated the conditions that affect the performance of partition testing and have compared analytically the fault-detecting ability of partition testing and random testing. This paper extends and generalizes some of their results. We give more general ways of characterizing the worst case for partition testing, along with a precise characterization of when this worst case is as good as random testing. We also find that partition testing is guaranteed to perform at least as well as random testing so long as the number of test cases selected is in proportion to the size of the subdomains.