Fast bandwidth reservation scheme with multi-line & multi-path routing in ATM networks
IEEE INFOCOM '92 Proceedings of the eleventh annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies on One world through communications (Vol. 3)
A reservation principle with applications to the ATM traffic control
Computer Networks and ISDN Systems - Special issue on the ATM—asynchronous transfer mode
Computer Networks and ISDN Systems - Special issue: telecommunication services for developing economics
Connectionless data service in an ATM-based customer premises network
Computer Networks and ISDN Systems
Multimedia traffic characteristics in broadband networks
IEEE Communications Magazine
IEEE Communications Magazine
IEEE Communications Magazine
LAN emulation on an ATM network
IEEE Communications Magazine
B-ISDN/ATM traffic and congestion control
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
Hi-index | 0.24 |
In this paper, we consider two burst admission control (BAC) schemes with cell multiplexing. One is the burst admission by threshold (BAT) scheme which uses the BAC function by comparing a threshold value with the queue size on the epoch receiving a burst request. Another is the burst admission by prediction of cell losses (BAPCL) scheme, which is based on the fact that it is possible to calculate the queue sizes at burst release times when there is a burst request. By a multi-level model with an MMDP/D/1/K queuing system, the performance and the effect of the two schemes are studied in view of burst and cell levels. Also, the performance of the peak bit-rate reservation (PBRR) scheme without cell buffering is considered with a backoff state. By numerical examples, we discuss the dependence of system performances on the traffic and the system parameters. In order to show the increase of multiplexing gain by the BAC schemes with cell multiplexing, we compare the admissible loads of the BAT and BAPCL schemes with those of the PBRR and the pure cell multiplexing schemes, where we can see that the BAT scheme has almost the same performance as the BAPCL scheme though the latter is superior to the former for most cases, especially for the stringent cell-loss sensitive case.