Net neutrality: the technical side of the debate: a white paper
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
Democratic and Anti-Democratic Regulators of the Internet: A Framework
The Information Society
Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics
Computational Linguistics
Epistemic Values and Information Management
The Information Society - The Philosophy of Information, its Nature, and Future Developments
HICSS '10 Proceedings of the 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Investigating multi-label classification for human values
Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem - Volume 47
On deception and deception detection: content analysis of computer-mediated stated beliefs
Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem - Volume 47
The Debate on Net Neutrality: A Policy Perspective
Information Systems Research
How to see values in social computing: methods for studying values dimensions
Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Net neutrality is the focus of an important policy debate that is tied to technological innovation, economic development, and information access. We examine the role of human values in shaping the Net neutrality debate through a content analysis of testimonies from U.S. Senate and FCC hearings on Net neutrality. The analysis is based on a coding scheme that we developed based on a pilot study in which we used the Schwartz Value Inventory. We find that the policy debate surrounding Net neutrality revolves primarily around differences in the frequency of expression of the values of innovation and wealth, such that the proponents of Net neutrality more frequently invoke innovation, while the opponents of Net neutrality more frequently invoke wealth in their prepared testimonies. The paper provides a novel approach for examining the Net neutrality debate and sheds light on the connection between information policy and research on human values. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.