Basic Concepts and Taxonomy of Dependable and Secure Computing
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
A new component concept for fault trees
SCS '03 Proceedings of the 8th Australian workshop on Safety critical systems and software - Volume 33
Efficient High Hamming Distance CRCs for Embedded Networks
DSN '06 Proceedings of the International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks
Early quality prediction of component-based systems - A generic framework
Journal of Systems and Software
Software components for reliable automotive systems
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe
Modular Architectural Representation and Analysis of Fault Propagation and Transformation
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS)
How to "Survive" a safety case according to ISO 26262
SAFECOMP'10 Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Computer safety, reliability, and security
Integrating system modelling with safety activities
SAFECOMP'10 Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Computer safety, reliability, and security
An approach to optimization of fault tolerant architectures using HiP-HOPS
Software—Practice & Experience
Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas
SPLC'05 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Software Product Lines
ISO/DIS 26262 in the context of electric and electronic architecture modeling
ISARCS'10 Proceedings of the First international conference on Architecting Critical Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
ISO 26262 addresses development of safe in-vehicle functions by specifying methods potentially used in the design and development lifecycle. It does not indicate what is sufficient and leaves room for interpretation. However, the architects of electric/electronic systems need design boundaries to make decisions during architecture evolution without adding a risk of late architectural changes. Designing and changing a system benefits from correct selection of safety mechanisms at early design stages. This paper presents an iterative architecture design and refinement process that is centered around ISO 26262 requirements. We propose a domain-specific modeling scheme and component repositories to build up a bottom-up analysis framework that allows early quantitative safety evaluation. To guarantee that the target ASIL level can be reached, we complement our design-time component-level analysis with conservative top-down analysis. Given that analysis starts at early design stages, evolution of the architecture is supported by different levels of detail used in the analysis framework.