Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment?

  • Authors:
  • Chi-Cheng Chang;Kuo-Hung Tseng;Ju-Shih Tseng

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, He-Ping East Road, Section 1, Taipei 106, Taiwan;Graduate Institute of Business and Management, Meiho University, Taiwan;Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, He-Ping East Road, Section 1, Taipei 106, Taiwan

  • Venue:
  • Computers & Education
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of English proficiency (low vs. high) and material presentation mode (single channel vs. dual channel) on English listening comprehension, cognitive load and learning attitude in a ubiquitous learning environment. An experimental learning activity was implemented using PDA as a learning tool to facilitate learning. A quasi-experimental design was employed with university students participating in the experiment. The results revealed that (a) high English proficiency learners had significantly better English listening comprehension and lower intrinsic and extraneous load than low English proficiency learners; (b) both high and low English proficiency learners learning with dual channel had significantly better English listening comprehension and held more positive attitude toward the ubiquitous learning environment than learners learning with single channel; (c) for learners learning with single channel, low English proficiency learners had significantly higher extraneous load than high English proficiency learners; and (d) for low English proficiency learners, learners who learned with dual channel possessed significantly lower extraneous load than learners who learned with single channel. The suggestions for educators and instructional designers were also discussed in the present study.