End-to-end arguments in system design
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS)
Journal of Systems Architecture: the EUROMICRO Journal
Personalized application enablement by web session analysis and multisource user profiling
Bell Labs Technical Journal - General Papers
Glasnost: enabling end users to detect traffic differentiation
NSDI'10 Proceedings of the 7th USENIX conference on Networked systems design and implementation
Net neutrality: A progress report
Telecommunications Policy
Policy implications of technology for detecting P2P and copyright violations
Telecommunications Policy
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Two case studies explore the reciprocal influence between technological change and Internet governance. Both focus on the use by Internet service providers of a new capability known as deep packet inspection (DPI). DPI was used by major network operators in the U.S. and Canada to block or restrict the speed of peer to peer file sharing traffic by their customers. In both cases, DPI implementations led to public protests, litigation and major regulatory proceedings. In both cases, network neutrality norms were used to challenge DPI deployments. The paper's descriptive comparison is supplemented by quantitative data drawn from the use of Glasnost, a network test that allows third parties to detect BitTorrent throttling via DPI. The paper asks whether the use of DPI by ISPs disrupted the way the Internet is regulated, and whether political and institutional factors alter or constrain DPI use. It finds that the power to shape traffic flows redistributes control among actors in the Internet ecosystem, generating broad political economy debates about efficiency, fairness, innovation and transparency. But the actual results of those conflicts are indeterminate, reflecting institutional and historical contingencies.