Characterizing indoor wireless channels via ray tracing combined with stochastic modeling
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
On the performance of cascaded generalized κ fading channels
GLOBECOM'09 Proceedings of the 28th IEEE conference on Global telecommunications
Product of the powers of generalized Nakagami-m variates and performance of cascaded fading channels
GLOBECOM'09 Proceedings of the 28th IEEE conference on Global telecommunications
BER performance of OFDM systems in mobile multi-hop relaying channels
Proceedings of the 6th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Statistical properties of the capacity of double Nakagami-m channels
ISWPC'10 Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international conference on Wireless pervasive computing
Wireless channels that exhibit "Worse than Rayleigh" fading: analytical and measurement results
MILCOM'06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE conference on Military communications
MILCOM'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE conference on Military communications - Volume II
Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal
A Nakagami-N-gamma Model for Shadowed Fading Channels
Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal
Hi-index | 0.13 |
Engineers designing and installing outdoor and indoor wireless communications systems need effective and practical tools to help them determine base station antenna locations for adequate signal coverage. Computer-based radio propagation prediction tools are now often used in designing these systems. We assess the performance of such a propagation tool based on ray-tracing and advanced computational methods. We have compared its predictions with outdoor experimental data collected in Manhattan and Boston (at 900 MHz and 2 GHz). The comparisons show that the computer-based propagation tool can predict signal strengths in these environments with very good accuracy. The prediction errors are within 6 dB in both mean and standard deviation. This shows that simulations, rather than costly field measurements, can lead to accurate determination of the coverage area for a given system design