Capacity upgrading in mobile ad hoc access networks (MAHANs) using CSMA/CAPA
Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Mobility management and wireless access
QoS-aware Internet access schemes for wireless mobile ad hoc networks
Computer Communications
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Multicast routing in mobile ad hoc networks by using a multiagent system
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Adaptive and intelligent path discovery on-demand for wireless networks using service composition
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Efficient route discovery in hybrid networks
Ad Hoc Networks
Performance comparison of end-to-end and on-the-spot traffic-aware techniques
International Journal of Communication Systems
ALiSR: Agent Based Link Stability Aware Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks
International Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems
Routing dual criterion protocol
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
Hi-index | 0.07 |
In this paper, we consider a mobile ad hoc wireless access network in which mobile nodes can access the Internet via one or more stationary gateway nodes. Mobile nodes outside the transmission range of the gateway can continue to communicate with the gateway via their neighboring nodes over multihop paths. On-demand routing schemes are appealing because of their low routing overhead in bandwidth restricted mobile ad hoc networks, however, their routing control overhead increases exponentially with node density in a given geographic area. To control the overhead of on-demand routing without sacrificing performance, we present a novel extension of the ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol, called LB-AODV, which incorporates the concept of load-balancing (LB). Simulation results show that as traffic increases, our proposed LB-AODV routing protocol has a significantly higher packet delivery fraction, a lower end-to-end delay and a reduced routing overhead when compared with both AODV and gossip-based routing protocols.