Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
CHI '90 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques
CHI '91 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The humane interface: new directions for designing interactive systems
The humane interface: new directions for designing interactive systems
Constructivism in computer science education
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching
Commonsense computing: what students know before we teach (episode 1: sorting)
Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research
Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction
Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction
Commonsense computing: using student sorting abilities to improve instruction
Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Commonsense computing (episode 5): algorithm efficiency and balloon testing
ICER '09 Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on Computing education research workshop
Student transformations: are they computer scientists yet?
ICER '09 Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on Computing education research workshop
Commonsense understanding of concurrency: computing students and concert tickets
Communications of the ACM
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This study examines the extent to which novice computing students with minimal computer science coursework and no training in user interface (UI) evaluation consider UI concepts such as usability, user experience, and the context in which software will be used when evaluating an interface. In analyzing the responses of 149 novice computer science students who were asked to evaluate two interfaces for converting temperatures between Fahrenheit and Celsius, we observed that students generally considered usability and user experience factors, but were less likely to consider context. For educators, this exact task could be given to a class in order to initiate discussion of user-centered design; the study also provides a framework for structuring the discussion. More generally, the results of this study provide insight into some opportunities and challenges in teaching good interface design and evaluation skills.