Digital Divide?: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Digital Divide?: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
The Analytic Hierarchy Process--An Exposition
Operations Research
Information and Management
Bridging digital divide: efforts in India
Telematics and Informatics - Special issue: The World summit on the information society (WSIS) from an Asian-Pacific region perspective
Syndicating Web Services: A QoS and user-driven approach
Decision Support Systems
The digital gap in Maracaibo city in Venezuela
Telematics and Informatics
A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: evidence for the European Union-15
Information and Management
Telematics and Informatics
Disparities in ICT adoption: A multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide
Telecommunications Policy
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
Guidelines for government-to-government initiative architecture in developing countries
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Many countries have devoted increasing attention to information infrastructures. However, a gap in digitalization exists among different government agencies, causing unequal opportunities for accessing infrastructures, information, and communication technologies. This paper, based on Gowin's Vee structure, is an empirical study of the digital divide in the context of local governments in Taiwan. A model for identifying and measuring aforementioned digital divide is constructed in this paper. We first refer to the grounded theory to draft a framework for measuring the digital divide in local governments. Then, through the use of a questionnaire distributed to experts implemented alongside the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), we generate five dimensions (including ICT infrastructure, human resources, external environment, internals of organization, and information) and 42 measures. Finally, we measure the actual levels of the digital divide in local governments with the resulting digital divide evaluation model. This paper aims to generate results that can serve as a reference for government agencies (at all levels) in the formulation of their digitalization strategies. Moreover, the digital divide evaluation model constructed in this study goes beyond existing measures and may serve as a reference for academics in the examination of methods to narrow the digital divide in various levels of governmental bodies. Taken together, the features of integration, comprehensiveness, and wide applicability of this proposed model can be considered the theoretical contributions to digital divide and local government hierarchy research.