Approximate Sparse Recovery: Optimizing Time and Measurements

• Authors: Anna C. Gilbert;Yi Li;Ely Porat;Martin J. Strauss
• Venue: SIAM Journal on Computing
• Year: 2012

A Euclidean approximate sparse recovery system consists of parameters $k,N$, an $m$-by-$N$ measurement matrix, $\bm{\Phi}$, and a decoding algorithm, $\mathcal{D}$. Given a vector, ${\mathbf x}$, the system approximates ${\mathbf x}$ by $\widehat {\mathbf x}=\mathcal{D}(\bm{\Phi} {\mathbf x})$, which must satisfy $|\widehat {\mathbf x} - {\mathbf x}|_2\le C |{\mathbf x} - {\mathbf x}_k|_2$, where ${\mathbf x}_k$ denotes the optimal $k$-term approximation to ${\mathbf x}$. (The output $\widehat{\mathbf x}$ may have more than $k$ terms.) For each vector ${\mathbf x}$, the system must succeed with probability at least 3/4. Among the goals in designing such systems are minimizing the number $m$ of measurements and the runtime of the decoding algorithm, $\mathcal{D}$. In this paper, we give a system with $m=O(k \log(N/k))$ measurements—matching a lower bound, up to a constant factor—and decoding time $k\log^{O(1)} N$, matching a lower bound up to a polylog$(N)$ factor. We also consider the encode time (i.e., the time to multiply $\bm{\Phi}$ by $x$), the time to update measurements (i.e., the time to multiply $\bm{\Phi}$ by a 1-sparse $x$), and the robustness and stability of the algorithm (resilience to noise before and after the measurements). Our encode and update times are optimal up to $\log(k)$ factors. The columns of $\bm{\Phi}$ have at most $O(\log^2(k)\log(N/k))$ nonzeros, each of which can be found in constant time. Our full result, a fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme, is as follows. If ${\mathbf x}={\mathbf x}_k+\nu_1$, where $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ (below) are arbitrary vectors (regarded as noise), then setting $\widehat {\mathbf x} = \mathcal{D}(\Phi {\mathbf x} + \nu_2)$, and for properly normalized $\bm{\Phi}$, we get $\left|{\mathbf x} - \widehat {\mathbf x}\right|_2^2 \le (1+\epsilon)\left|\nu_1\right|_2^2 + \epsilon\left|\nu_2\right|_2^2$ using $O((k/\epsilon)\log(N/k))$ measurements and $(k/\epsilon)\log^{O(1)}(N)$ time for decoding.