Personalizing communication about trust

Authors:
Andrew Koster;Jordi Sabater-Mir;Marco Schorlemmer
Affiliations:
IIIA-CSIC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain;IIIA-CSIC, Spain;IIIA-CSIC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
Venue:
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
Year:
2012

Citing 11
Cited 0

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Computability and complexity: from a programming perspective

Computability and complexity: from a programming perspective
TRAVOS: Trust and Reputation in the Context of Inaccurate Information Sources

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Using arguments for making and explaining decisions

Artificial Intelligence
A social-network defence against whitewashing

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Inductively generated trust alignments based on shared interactions

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
An Argumentation-Based Dialog for Social Evaluations Exchange

Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Recommender Systems Handbook

Recommender Systems Handbook
Argumentation-based reasoning in agents with varying degrees of trust

The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
An abstract framework for reasoning about trust

The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Opening the black box of trust

Journal of Logic and Computation

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Agents in open multi-agent systems must deal with the difficult problem of selecting interaction partners in the face of uncertainty about their behaviour. This is especially problematic if they have to interact with an agent they have not interacted with before. In this case they can turn to their peers for information about this potential partner. However, in scenarios where agents may be evaluated according to many different criteria for many different purposes, their peers' evaluations may be mismatched with regards to their own expectations. In this paper we present a novel method, using an argumentation framework, that allows agents to discuss and adapt their trust model. This allows agents to provide, and receive, personalized trust evaluations, better suited to the agent in need, as is shown in a prototypical experiment.