IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems
Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
Low-power wireless IPv6 routing with ContikiRPL
Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks
Routing Loops in DAG-Based Low Power and Lossy Networks
AINA '10 Proceedings of the 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications
A framework for low-power IPv6 routing simulation, experimentation, and evaluation
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference
Interconnecting Smart Objects with IP: The Next Internet
Interconnecting Smart Objects with IP: The Next Internet
Multipoint-to-Point and Broadcast in RPL
NBIS '10 Proceedings of the 2010 13th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems
NBIS '10 Proceedings of the 2010 13th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems
VeRA - Version Number and Rank Authentication in RPL
MASS '11 Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems
F-LQE: a fuzzy link quality estimator for wireless sensor networks
EWSN'10 Proceedings of the 7th European conference on Wireless Sensor Networks
Monitoring and security for the internet of things
AIMS'13 Proceedings of the 7th IFIP WG 6.6 international conference on Autonomous Infrastructure, Management, and Security: emerging management mechanisms for the future internet - Volume 7943
Hi-index | 0.00 |
IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) is a routing protocol specifically designed for Low power and Lossy Networks (LLN) compliant with the 6LoWPAN protocol. It currently shows up as an RFC proposed by the IETF ROLL working group. However, RPL has gained a lot of maturity and is attracting increasing interest in the research community. The absence of surveys about RPL motivates us to write this paper, with the objective to provide a quick introduction to RPL. In addition, we present the most relevant research efforts made around RPL routing protocol that pertain to its performance evaluation, implementation, experimentation, deployment and improvement. We also present an experimental performance evaluation of RPL for different network settings to understand the impact of the protocol attributes on the network behavior, namely in terms of convergence time, energy, packet loss and packet delay. Finally, we point out open research challenges on the RPL design. We believe that this survey will pave the way for interested researchers to understand its behavior and contributes for further relevant research works.