Biometric zoos: Theory and experimental evidence

  • Authors:
  • Mohammad Nayeem Teli;J. Ross Beveridge;P. Jonathon Phillips;Geof H. Givens;David S. Bolme;Bruce A. Draper

  • Affiliations:
  • Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA;Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA;Information Access Division, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA;Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA;Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA;Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA

  • Venue:
  • IJCB '11 Proceedings of the 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Several studies have shown the existence of biometric zoos. The premise is that in biometric systems people fall into distinct categories, labeled with animal names, indicating recognition difficulty. Different combinations of excessive false accepts or rejects correspond to labels such as: Goat, Lamb, Wolf, etc. Previous work on biometric zoos has investigated the existence of zoos for the results of an algorithm on a data set. This work investigates biometric zoos generalization across algorithms and data sets. For example, if a subject is a Goat for algorithm A on data set X, is that subject also a Goat for algorithm B on data set Y? This paper introduces a theoretical framework for generalizing biometric zoos. Based on our framework, we develop an experimental methodology for determining if biometric zoos generalize across algorithms and data sets, and we conduct a series of experiments to investigate the existence of zoos on two algorithms in FRVT 2006.