Concept learning and heuristic classification in weak-theory domains
Artificial Intelligence
A Two Layer Case-Based Reasoning Architecture for Medical Image Understanding
EWCBR '96 Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning
Case-Based Reasoning Technology, From Foundations to Applications
Case-Based Reasoning in CARE-PARTNER: Gathering Evidence for Evidence-Based Medical Practice
EWCBR '98 Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning
Medical applications in case-based reasoning
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Special issue on case-based reasoning in the health sciences
Applied Intelligence
An Analysis of Research Themes in the CBR Conference Literature
ECCBR '08 Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning
Case-based reasoning in the health sciences: What's next?
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
GUEST EDITORIAL: Case-based reasoning in the health sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Guest Editorial: Advances in case-based reasoning in the health sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Case-Based Reasoning Systems in the Health Sciences: A Survey of Recent Trends and Developments
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Research in case-based reasoning (CBR) in the health sciences started more than 20 years ago and has been steadily expanding during these years. This paper describes the state of the research through an analysis of its mainstream, or core, literature. The methodology followed involves first the definition of a classification and indexing scheme for this research area using a tiered approach to paper categorization based on application domain, purpose of the research, memory organization, reasoning characteristics, and system design. A research theme can be tied to any of the previous classification elements. The paper further analyzes the evolution of the literature, its characteristics in terms of highest impact, or most cited, papers, and draws conclusions from this analysis. Finally, a comparison with the themes automatically learned through clustering co-citations matrices with the Ensemble Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) algorithm in the CBR conference literature is proposed. This comparison helps better understand the main characteristics of the field and propose future directions.