Journal of Systems and Software
A Visual Text Mining approach for Systematic Reviews
ESEM '07 Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Information and Software Technology
Motivation in Software Engineering: A systematic literature review
Information and Software Technology
A systematic review of theory use in studies investigating the motivations of software engineers
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
A Systematic Review of Software Product Lines Applied to Mobile Middleware
ITNG '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations
Process models for service-based applications: A systematic literature review
Information and Software Technology
Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study
Information and Software Technology
Code Bad Smells: a review of current knowledge
Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice
A comparative study of challenges in integrating Open Source Software and Inner Source Software
Information and Software Technology
EASE'10 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Prediction Performance in Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Background: Systematic literature reviews are increasingly used in software engineering. Most systematic literature reviews require several hundred papers to be examined and assessed. This is not a trivial task and can be time consuming and error-prone. Aim: We present SLuRp - our open source web enabled database that supports the management of systematic literature reviews. Method: We describe the functionality of SLuRp and explain how it supports all phases in a systematic literature review. Results: We show how we used SLuRp in our SLR. We discuss how SLuRp enabled us to generate complex results in which we had confidence. Conclusions: SLuRp supports all phases of an SLR and enables reliable results to be generated. If we are to have confidence in the outcomes of SLRs it is essential that such automated systems are used.