Lessons learned from evaluating a checklist for reporting experimental and observational research

Authors:
Roel Wieringa;Nelly Condori-Fernandez;Maya Daneva;Bela Mutschler;Oscar Pastor
Affiliations:
University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands;University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands;University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands;University of Applied Sciences, Ravensburg-Weingarten, Germany;Universidad Poltécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Venue:
Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement
Year:
2012

Citing 6
Cited 0

Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction

Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction
Evaluating guidelines for reporting empirical software engineering studies

Empirical Software Engineering
Designing Requirements Engineering Research

CERE '07 Proceedings of the 2007 Fifth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering

Empirical Software Engineering
Can we evaluate the quality of software engineering experiments?

Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation

Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This short paper summarizes and discusses the result of an iterative construction and evaluation of a checklist for writing and reading reports about experimental and observational research.