Free vs. transcribed text for keystroke-dynamics evaluations

  • Authors:
  • Kevin S. Killourhy;Roy A. Maxion

  • Affiliations:
  • Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA;Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on Learning from Authoritative Security Experiment Results
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Background. One revolutionary application of keystroke dynamics is continuous reauthentication: confirming a typist's identity during normal computer usage without interrupting the user. Aim. In laboratory evaluations, subjects are typically given transcription tasks rather than free composition (e.g., copying rather than composing text), because transcription is easier for subjects. This work establishes whether free and transcribed text produce equivalent evaluation results. Method. Twenty subjects completed comparable transcription and free-composition tasks; two keystroke-dynamics classifiers were implemented; each classifier was evaluated using both the free-composition and transcription samples. Results. Transcription hold and keydown-keydown times are 2--3 milliseconds slower than free-text features; t-tests showed these effects to be significant. However, these effects did not significantly change evaluation results. Conclusions. The additional difficulty of collecting freely composed text from subjects seems unnecessary; researchers are encouraged to continue using transcription tasks.