Graph drawing by force-directed placement
Software—Practice & Experience
Graph drawing aesthetics and the comprehension of UML class diagrams: an empirical study
APVis '01 Proceedings of the 2001 Asia-Pacific symposium on Information visualisation - Volume 9
Empirical Evaluation of Aesthetics-based Graph Layout
Empirical Software Engineering
Validating Graph Drawing Aesthetics
GD '95 Proceedings of the Symposium on Graph Drawing
Drawing High Degree Graphs with Low Bend Numbers
GD '95 Proceedings of the Symposium on Graph Drawing
Which Aesthetic has the Greatest Effect on Human Understanding?
GD '97 Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Graph Drawing
Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics
Information Visualization
APVis '05 proceedings of the 2005 Asia-Pacific symposium on Information visualisation - Volume 45
As time goes by: integrated visualization and analysis of dynamic networks
AVI '08 Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
The aesthetics of graph visualization
Computational Aesthetics'07 Proceedings of the Third Eurographics conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging
Establishing aesthetics based on human graph reading behavior: two eye tracking studies
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Improving multiple aesthetics produces better graph drawings
Journal of Visual Languages and Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we present the results of a user study comparing the readability of force-directed, orthogonal, and hierarchical graph layouts. To this end we identified prototypical tasks which are solved using visual representations of graphs. Based on the correctness of answers and the related response time we evaluated for each task which layout is better suited. In addition, we found possible explanations for these results by analyzing the eye-tracking data. Finally, we discuss some implications of our findings for algorithm designers and application developers.