WordNet: a lexical database for English
Communications of the ACM
An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity
ICML '98 Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning
Verbs semantics and lexical selection
ACL '94 Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
Ontological Dimensions Applied to Natural Interaction
ONTORACT '08 Proceedings of the 2008 First International Workshop on Ontologies in Interactive Systems
WordNet::Similarity: measuring the relatedness of concepts
HLT-NAACL--Demonstrations '04 Demonstration Papers at HLT-NAACL 2004
OSS: a semantic similarity function based on hierarchical ontologies
IJCAI'07 Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence
Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy
IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Cognos: a natural interaction knowledge management toolkit
NLDB'09 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The focus of this paper is the calculation of similarity between two concepts from an ontology for a Human-Like Interaction system. In order to facilitate this calculation, a similarity function is proposed based on five dimensions (sort, compositional, essential, restrictive and descriptive) constituting the structure of ontological knowledge. The paper includes a proposal for computing a similarity function for each dimension of knowledge. Later on, the similarity values obtained are weighted and aggregated to obtain a global similarity measure. In order to calculate those weights associated to each dimension, four training methods have been proposed. The training methods differ in the element to fit: the user, concepts or pairs of concepts, and a hybrid approach. For evaluating the proposal, the knowledge base was fed from Word Net and extended by using a knowledge editing toolkit (Cognos). The evaluation of the proposal is carried out through the comparison of system responses with those given by human test subjects, both providing a measure of the soundness of the procedure and revealing ways in which the proposal may be improved.