Maximum matchings in sparse random graphs: Karp-Sipser revisited
Random Structures & Algorithms
SIAM Journal on Computing
FOCS '02 Proceedings of the 43rd Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Cuckoo hashing: further analysis
Information Processing Letters
Existence of a perfect matching in a random (1 +e-1)--out bipartite graph
Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B
Journal of Algorithms
Cores in random hypergraphs and Boolean formulas
Random Structures & Algorithms
The cores of random hypergraphs with a given degree sequence
Random Structures & Algorithms
Why simple hash functions work: exploiting the entropy in a data stream
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Maximum matching in sparse random graphs
SFCS '81 Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Tight thresholds for cuckoo hashing via XORSAT
ICALP'10 Proceedings of the 37th international colloquium conference on Automata, languages and programming
Efficient erasure correcting codes
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Sharp load thresholds for cuckoo hashing
Random Structures & Algorithms
Sharp load thresholds for cuckoo hashing
Random Structures & Algorithms
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We study the the following question in Random Graphs. We are given two disjoint sets L,R with |L| = n and |R| = m. We construct a random graph G by allowing each x∈L to choose d random neighbours in R. The question discussed is as to the size μ(G) of the largest matching in G. When considered in the context of Cuckoo Hashing, one key question is as to when is μ(G) = n whp? We answer this question exactly when d is at least three. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2012 © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.