Digital Image Warping
Competitive Coding Scheme for Palmprint Verification
ICPR '04 Proceedings of the Pattern Recognition, 17th International Conference on (ICPR'04) Volume 1 - Volume 01
International Journal of Computer Vision - Special Issue on Texture Analysis and Synthesis
Palmprint Identification Using PalmCodes
ICIG '04 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Image and Graphics
Ordinal Palmprint Represention for Personal Identification
CVPR '05 Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Volume 1 - Volume 01
A Biometric Identification System Based on Eigenpalm and Eigenfinger Features
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
ICPR '06 Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition - Volume 04
Image and Vision Computing
Model-guided deformable hand shape recognition without positioning aids
Pattern Recognition
Multimodal biometric identification system based on finger geometry, knuckle print and palm print
Pattern Recognition Letters
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In recent years, palmprint based personal identification has been extensively explored by researchers. The success of this technology has demonstrated that the inner part of palm skin is capable of distinguishing one person from another in case that proper representation is utilized. However, earlier work mainly focused on scenarios where the position and pose of hands are constrained by pegs or plates. In contrast, our purpose is to design and implement a system which is capable of recognizing an individual once he/she naturally stretches his/her hand in front of the camera. Since human hand is an articulated object, it is important to filter out geometry variations. This paper presents and compares two hand texture based personal identification methods, which are called hand-print verification in this paper to denote the idea of utilizing whole hand skin image for recognition. In one of the method, hand articulation is eliminated in a well-defined way and then the hand is treated as a whole for feature extraction, while in the other method, features are extracted in different parts of the hand, and final decision is made in a matching score level fusion manner. Experimental results for both methods are presented and compared.