Program evolution: processes of software change
Program evolution: processes of software change
Design complexity measurement and testing
Communications of the ACM
Software metrics (2nd ed.): a rigorous and practical approach
Software metrics (2nd ed.): a rigorous and practical approach
Elements of Software Science (Operating and programming systems series)
Elements of Software Science (Operating and programming systems series)
Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
Third time charm: Stronger prediction of programmer performance by software complexity metrics
ICSE '79 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Software engineering
Spatial Complexity Metrics: An Investigation of Utility
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
MSR '05 Proceedings of the 2005 international workshop on Mining software repositories
Longitudinal analysis of long-timescale open source repository data
PROMISE '05 Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Predictor models in software engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Software complexity measures are essential aspects of software engineering. Relatively few studies have been conducted to compare the performance of different complexity metrics. This paper describes an experimental investigation, which compares the performance of three different software complexity metrics; McCabe's cyclomatic complexity, Halstead's complexity measures and Douce's spatial complexity, by using data from an Open Source project Eclipse JDT. The results of this investigation indicate that in different situation these complexity metrics show different performance. However, Halstead's effort measure and Douce's spatial complexity are highly correlated, showing bigger correlation coefficient values. This leads us to suggest that because Halstead's complexity measure is more mature and has better supporting tools, it may be a good idea to replace Douce's spatial complexity metric with Halstead's effort measure in practice.