A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts

Authors:
Kyung-Soo Jun;Eun-Sung Chung;Young-Gyu Kim;Yeonjoo Kim
Affiliations:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea;Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Gongneung-Ro 232, Nowon-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea;Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Gongneung-Ro 232, Nowon-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea;Korea Environment Institute, 290 Jinheungno, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Venue:
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Year:
2013

Citing 4
Cited 1

Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment

Fuzzy Sets and Systems
A fuzzy optimization method for multicriteria decision making: An application to reservoir flood control operation

Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry

Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making

Mathematical and Computer Modelling: An International Journal

Robust spatial flood vulnerability assessment for Han River using fuzzy TOPSIS with α-cut level set

Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal

Quantified Score

Hi-index	12.05

Visualization

Abstract

This study develops a framework to quantify the flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts. On the basis of the concept of exposure-sensitivity-adaptive capacity, 21 proxy variables are selected and screened, and their weights are determined for their objectivity by using the Delphi technique. The data from 16 provinces of South Korea and the weighting values of all proxy variables are fuzzified to consider uncertainty. In addition, the National Center for Atmosphere Research Community Climate System Model 3 (CCSM3) in conjunction with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emission Scenario (SRES) A1B, A2, B1, A1T, A1FI, and B2 are used for future climate data (2020s, 2050s, and 2080s). Therefore, 19 flood risk vulnerabilities of South Korea, including present conditions, are quantitatively evaluated and compared. Three Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques - Weighted Sum Method (WSM), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Situation (TOPSIS), and fuzzy TOPSIS - are used to quantify all spatial vulnerabilities. As a result, some fuzzy TOPSIS rankings are quite different to those of WSM and TOPSIS, and the ranking patterns of the 19 climate change scenarios are also derived in a dissimilar way. In addition, if the variances of the provinces' rankings are considered, some provinces showing low values can plan their climate change adaptation strategies by taking into consideration their relatively certain rankings. In the end, the vulnerability assessment for climate change should consider not only various MCDM techniques but also the uncertainty of weighting values and proxy variable data.