Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors
International Journal of Computer Vision - Special issue on a special section on visual surveillance
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
CVPR '05 Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Volume 1 - Volume 01
Overview of the Face Recognition Grand Challenge
CVPR '05 Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Volume 1 - Volume 01
ICCV '05 Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1 - Volume 01
The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge
International Journal of Computer Vision
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
A comparative evaluation of interest point detectors and local descriptors for visual SLAM
Machine Vision and Applications
Multiresolution models for object detection
ECCV'10 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Computer vision: Part IV
CVPR '11 Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
ICCV '11 Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
Coloring Action Recognition in Still Images
International Journal of Computer Vision
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper shows how to analyze the influences of object characteristics on detection performance and the frequency and impact of different types of false positives. In particular, we examine effects of occlusion, size, aspect ratio, visibility of parts, viewpoint, localization error, and confusion with semantically similar objects, other labeled objects, and background. We analyze two classes of detectors: the Vedaldi et al. multiple kernel learning detector and different versions of the Felzenszwalb et al. detector. Our study shows that sensitivity to size, localization error, and confusion with similar objects are the most impactful forms of error. Our analysis also reveals that many different kinds of improvement are necessary to achieve large gains, making more detailed analysis essential for the progress of recognition research. By making our software and annotations available, we make it effortless for future researchers to perform similar analysis.