On online labeling with polynomially many labels

  • Authors:
  • Martin Babka;Jan Bulánek;Vladimír Čunát;Michal Koucký;Michael Saks

  • Affiliations:
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic;Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University, Denmark;Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University

  • Venue:
  • ESA'12 Proceedings of the 20th Annual European conference on Algorithms
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In the online labeling problem with parameters n and m we are presented with a sequence of nkeys from a totally ordered universe U and must assign each arriving key a label from the label set {1,2,…,m} so that the order of labels (strictly) respects the ordering on U. As new keys arrive it may be necessary to change the labels of some items; such changes may be done at any time at unit cost for each change. The goal is to minimize the total cost. An alternative formulation of this problem is the file maintenance problem, in which the items, instead of being labeled, are maintained in sorted order in an array of length m, and we pay unit cost for moving an item. For the case m=cn for constant c1, there are known algorithms that use at most O(n log(n)2) relabelings in total [9], and it was shown recently that this is asymptotically optimal [1]. For the case of m=θ(nC) for C1, algorithms are known that use O(n logn) relabelings. A matching lower bound was claimed in [7]. That proof involved two distinct steps: a lower bound for a problem they call prefix bucketing and a reduction from prefix bucketing to online labeling. The reduction seems to be incorrect, leaving a (seemingly significant) gap in the proof. In this paper we close the gap by presenting a correct reduction to prefix bucketing. Furthermore we give a simplified and improved analysis of the prefix bucketing lower bound. This improvement allows us to extend the lower bounds for online labeling to the case where the number m of labels is superpolynomial in n. In particular, for superpolynomial m we get an asymptotically optimal lower bound Ω((n logn) / (loglogm−loglogn)).