How (well) do datalog, SPARQL and RIF interplay?

Authors:
Axel Polleres
Affiliations:
Siemens AG Österreich, Vienna, Austria
Venue:
Datalog 2.0'12 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Datalog in Academia and Industry
Year:
2012

Citing 8
Cited 1

From SPARQL to rules (and back)

Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web
Networked graphs: a declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web

Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
The Expressive Power of SPARQL

ISWC '08 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on The Semantic Web
Semantics and complexity of SPARQL

ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)
SPARQL++ for mapping between RDF vocabularies

OTM'07 Proceedings of the 2007 OTM Confederated international conference on On the move to meaningful internet systems: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS - Volume Part I
Semantics and complexity of SPARQL

ISWC'06 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on The Semantic Web
Counting beyond a Yottabyte, or how SPARQL 1.1 property paths will prevent adoption of the standard

Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
The complexity of evaluating path expressions in SPARQL

PODS '12 Proceedings of the 31st symposium on Principles of Database Systems

A variant of earley deduction with partial evaluation

RR'13 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this tutorial we will give an overview of the W3C standard query language for RDF --- SPARQL --- and its relation to Datalog as well as on the interplay with another W3C standard closely related to Datalog, the Rule Interchange Format (RIF). As we will learn --- while these three interplay nicely on the surface and in academic research papers --- some details within the W3C specs impose challenges on seamlessly integrating Datalog rules and SPARQL.