A Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation
AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation with vague knowledge
UAI '04 Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Syncretic Argumentation by Means of Lattice Homomorphism
PRIMA '09 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Principles of Practice in Multi-Agent Systems
How agents should exploit tetralemma with an eastern mind in argumentation
PRIMA'04 Proceedings of the 7th Pacific Rim international conference on Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we describe a novel approach to the syncretic argumentation, which allows agents with different epistemology to engage in argumentation, taking into account the Golden Rule in the ethics of reciprocity and Confucius' Golden Rule. We address this new argumentation framework in two ways. One is by introducing the lattice homomorphism on truth-values (epistemic states) of propositions, and the new definitions of arguments justified under syncretized knowledge base. For the other, we first devise a new way of fusing two lattices through the lattice product, and then give a syncretic argumentation framework in which argumentation is done under the fused lattice. We further touch upon the third approach to the syncretic argumentation, by the lattice sum.