Cooperative dialogues for defeasible argumentation-based planning

Authors:
Pere Pardo;Sergio Pajares Ferrando;Eva Onaindia;Lluís Godo;Pilar Dellunde
Affiliations:
IIIA - CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain;Universitat Polit‘ecnica de Val‘encia, Valencia, Spain;Universitat Polit‘ecnica de Val‘encia, Valencia, Spain;IIIA - CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain;IIIA - CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain,Universitat Aut‘onoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
Venue:
ArgMAS'11 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Year:
2011

Citing 22
Cited 0

Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving

Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving
Reasoning about action II: the qualification problem

Artificial Intelligence
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation

Artificial Intelligence
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Bridging the gap between planning and scheduling

The Knowledge Engineering Review
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Argumentation-based negotiation

The Knowledge Engineering Review
An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning

AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning

AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Argumentation in artificial intelligence

Artificial Intelligence
Accelerating partial-order planners: some techniques for effective search control and pruning

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Defeasible reasoning and partial order planning

FoIKS'08 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Foundations of information and knowledge systems
Agreeing on plans through iterated disputes

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law

Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
Multiagent argumentation for cooperative planning in DeLP-POP

The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
t-DeLP: a temporal extension of the defeasible logic programming argumentative framework

SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
An architecture for defeasible-reasoning-based cooperative distributed planning

OTM'11 Proceedings of the 2011th Confederated international conference on On the move to meaningful internet systems - Volume Part I
A model for integrating dialogue and the execution of joint plans

ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Realizing argumentation in multi-agent systems using defeasible logic programming

ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Arguments over co-operative plans

TAFA'11 Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation
Temporal defeasible argumentation in multi-agent planning

IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Three
Defeasible argumentation for multi-agent planning in ambient intelligence applications

Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This contribution proposes a model for argumentation-based multi-agent planning, with a focus on cooperative scenarios. We slightly modify a previous proposal, multi-agent DeLP-POP, by imposing agents a standard representation of planning domains that facilitates argumentative planning. In DeLP-POP (partial order planning extended with defeasible logic programming) cooperative agents plan for joint goals, by dialoguing during the plan construction (exchanging plan proposals, plus arguments against these). Plan steps include actions and arguments, but the latter can also pose threats to the currently discussed plan.