A systematic approach to justifying sufficient confidence in software safety arguments

  • Authors:
  • Anaheed Ayoub;BaekGyu Kim;Insup Lee;Oleg Sokolsky

  • Affiliations:
  • Computer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania;Computer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania;Computer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania;Computer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania

  • Venue:
  • SAFECOMP'12 Proceedings of the 31st international conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Safety arguments typically have some weaknesses. To show that the overall confidence in the safety argument is considered acceptable, it is necessary to identify the weaknesses associated with the aspects of a safety argument and supporting evidence, and manage them. Confidence arguments are built to show the existence of sufficient confidence in the developed safety arguments. In this paper, we propose an approach to systematically constructing confidence arguments and identifying the weaknesses of the software safety arguments. The proposed approach is described and illustrated with a running example.