Measurement-driven modeling of transmission coordination for 802.11 online

  • Authors:
  • Eugenio Magistretti;Omer Gurewitz;Edward W. Knightly

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX;Department of Communication Systems Engineering, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX

  • Venue:
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In 802.11 managed wireless networks, the manager can address underserved links by rate-limiting the conflicting nodes. In order to determine to what extent each conflicting node is responsible for the poor performance, the manager needs to understand the coordination among conflicting nodes' transmissions. In this paper, we present a management framework called Management, Inference, and Diagnostics using Activity Share (MIDAS). We introduce the concept of Activity Share, which characterizes the coordination among any set of network nodes in terms of the time they spend transmitting simultaneously. Unfortunately, the Activity Share cannot be locally measured by the nodes. Thus, MIDAS comprises an inference tool that, based on a combined physical, protocol, and statistical approach, infers the Activity Share by using a small set of passively collected, time-aggregate local channel measurements reported by the nodes. MIDAS uses the estimated Activity Share as the input of a simple model that predicts how limiting the transmission rate of any conflicting node would benefit the throughput of the underserved link. The model is based on the current network conditions, thus representing the first throughput model using online measurements. We implemented our tool on real hardware and deployed it on an indoor testbed. Our extensive validation combines testbed experiments and simulations. The results show that MIDAS infers the Activity Share with a mean relative error as low as 4% in testbed experiments.