Comparing validation results for two DIME/PMESII models: understanding coverage profiles

Authors:
Dean S. Hartley, III
Affiliations:
Hartley Consulting, Oak Ridge, TN
Venue:
Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
Year:
2010

Citing 5
Cited 0

Credibility assessment of simulation results

WSC '86 Proceedings of the 18th conference on Winter simulation
An overview of verification and validation of simulation models

WSC '87 Proceedings of the 19th conference on Winter simulation
Simulation Validation - a Confidence Assessment Methodology

Simulation Validation - a Confidence Assessment Methodology
Credibility assessment: a collaborative evaluation environment for credibility assessment of modeling and simulation applications

Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers
Validation and verification of simulation models

WSC '04 Proceedings of the 36th conference on Winter simulation

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Coverage profiles help in visualizing what is modeled and how well it is modeled. Two DIME/PMESII models with initial validation results for their conceptual models are compared. The differences in their coverage profiles are examined and related to the differences in the purposes of the models. These results are used to draw conclusions about general models.