A system identification analysis of neural adaptation dynamics and nonlinear responses in the local reflex control of locust hind limbs

  • Authors:
  • Oliver P. Dewhirst;Natalia Angarita-Jaimes;David M. Simpson;Robert Allen;Philip L. Newland

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK SO17 1BJ;Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK SO17 1BJ;Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK SO17 1BJ;Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK SO17 1BJ;Centre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK SO17 1BJ

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Computational Neuroscience
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Nonlinear type system identification models coupled with white noise stimulation provide an experimentally convenient and quick way to investigate the often complex and nonlinear interactions between the mechanical and neural elements of reflex limb control systems. Previous steady state analysis has allowed the neurons in such systems to be categorised by their sensitivity to position, velocity or acceleration (dynamics) and has improved our understanding of network function. These neurons, however, are known to adapt their output amplitude or spike firing rate during repetitive stimulation and this transient response may be more important than the steady state response for reflex control. In the current study previously used system identification methods are developed and applied to investigate both steady state and transient dynamic and nonlinear changes in the neural circuit responsible for controlling reflex movements of the locust hind limbs. Through the use of a parsimonious model structure and Monte Carlo simulations we conclude that key system dynamics remain relatively unchanged during repetitive stimulation while output amplitude adaptation is occurring. Whilst some evidence of a significant change was found in parts of the systems nonlinear response, the effect was small and probably of little physiological relevance. Analysis using biologically more realistic stimulation reinforces this conclusion.