The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization
The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization
Argumentation in Explanations to Logical Problems
ICCS '01 Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Sciences-Part I
The rhetorical parsing of natural language texts
ACL '98 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Generating the structure of argument
COLING '98 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
Movie review mining and summarization
CIKM '06 Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
Extracting product features and opinions from reviews
HLT '05 Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis
HLT '05 Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval
Content ordering in the generation of persuasive discourse
IJCAI'97 Proceedings of the Fifteenth international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 2
Identifying expressions of opinion in context
IJCAI'07 Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence
Genre-based paragraph classification for sentiment analysis
SIGDIAL '09 Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
Argument Analysis: Components of Interpersonal Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Computational Linguistics
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this article, the authors present foundational elements related to argument extraction in opinion texts with the objective to design a model of how consumers develop argumentation in such texts. A second goal is to analyze and synthesize user preferences and therefore user value systems from these arguments. They show that 1 within the context of opinionated expressions, a number of evaluative expressions with a 'heavy' semantic load receive an argumentative interpretation, and 2 that the association of an evaluative expression with a discourse structure such as an elaboration, an illustration, or a reformulation must also be interpreted as an argument. The authors develop a conceptual semantics of these discourse structures and show how they are analyzed using the Dislog programming language, running on the platform, dedicated to discourse analysis.