Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations
Revised Papers from the NODe 2002 Web and Database-Related Workshops on Web, Web-Services, and Database Systems
The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications
The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications
Ontology Matching
Learning Disjointness for Debugging Mappings between Lightweight Ontologies
EKAW '08 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Knowledge Engineering: Practice and Patterns
Ontology Integration Using Mappings: Towards Getting the Right Logical Consequences
ESWC 2009 Heraklion Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
A Reasoning-Based Support Tool for Ontology Mapping Evaluation
ESWC 2009 Heraklion Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
Inconsistencies, negations and changes in ontologies
AAAI'06 proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Semantic precision and recall for ontology alignment evaluation
IJCAI'07 Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence
Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies
IJCAI'05 Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence
An Efficient Method for Computing Alignment Diagnoses
RR '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems
A Conflict-Based Operator for Mapping Revision
ISWC '09 Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference
A Practical Implementation of Semantic Precision and Recall
CISIS '10 Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems
Schema Matching and Mapping
A survey of schema-based matching approaches
Journal on Data Semantics IV
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Ontology mapping plays an important role in the Semantic Web, which generates correspondences between different ontologies. Usually, precision and recall are used to evaluate the performance of a mapping method. However, they do not take into account of the semantics of the mapping. Thus, semantic precision and recall are proposed to resolve the restricted set-theoretic foundation of precision and recall. But the semantic measures do not consider the incoherence in a mapping which causes some trivialization problems. In this paper, we propose semantic measures for evaluating incoherent ontology mappings. Specifically, a general definition of semantic measures is given based on a set of formal definitions capturing reasoning with incoherent mappings. Then we develop a concrete approach to reasoning with incoherent mappings, which results in some specific semantic measures. Finally, we conduct experiments on the data set of conference track provided by OAEI.