Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Depth-first search and linear grajh algorithms
SWAT '71 Proceedings of the 12th Annual Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory (swat 1971)
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Mental models of menu structures in diabetes assistants
ICCHP'10 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computers helping people with special needs
Potential of e-travel assistants to increase older adults' mobility
USAB'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on HCI in work and learning, life and leisure: workgroup human-computer interaction and usability engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Large-scale research problems (e.g. health and aging, eonomics and production in high-wage countries) are typically complex, needing competencies and research input of different disciplines [1]. Hence, cooperative working in mixed teams is a common research procedure to meet multi-faceted research problems. Though, interdisciplinarity is --- socially and scientifically --- a challenge, not only in steering cooperation quality, but also in evaluating the interdisciplinary performance. In this paper we demonstrate how using mixed-node publication network graphs can be used in order to get insights into social structures of research groups. Explicating the published element of cooperation in a network graph reveals more than simple co-authorship graphs. The validity of the approach was tested on the 3-year publication outcome of an interdisciplinary research group. The approach was highly useful not only in demonstrating network properties like propinquity and homophily, but also in proposing a performance metric of interdisciplinarity. Furthermore we suggest applying the approach to a large research cluster as a method of self-management and enriching the graph with sociometric data to improve intelligibility of the graph.