Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Robust Real-Time Face Detection
International Journal of Computer Vision
ICCV '05 Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision - Volume 2
Computer aided detection via asymmetric cascade of sparse hyperplane classifiers
Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Probabilistic 3D Polyp Detection in CT Images: The Role of Sample Alignment
CVPR '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2
Robust Object Detection with Interleaved Categorization and Segmentation
International Journal of Computer Vision
General framework for automatic detection of matching lesions in follow-up CT
ISBI'09 Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE international conference on Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro
Automatic detection and segmentation of axillary lymph nodes
MICCAI'10 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention: Part I
Automatic detection and segmentation of ground glass opacity nodules
MICCAI'06 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Volume Part I
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The automatic detection and segmentation of liver lesion is useful in many clinical application, whereas it remains a challenging task due to the largely varied shape, size and texture of the diseased masses. In this paper, we present a cascade learning approach comprising multiple classifiers for the detection of two different types of solid liver lesions, hypodense and hyperdense lesions. In particular, we propose an efficient gradient based locally adaptive segmentation method for the solid lesions, where the segmentation results are used to extract shape features to boost up the detection performance. The proposed method is validated on a total of 660 volumes with 1,302 hypodense lesions, and 234 volumes with 328 hyperdense lesions. The experimental results show a resulting 90% detection rate at 1.01 false positives per volume for hypodense lesion and 1.58 false positives per volume for hyperdense lesion, respectively, using three fold cross validation.