Assessing composition in modeling approaches

  • Authors:
  • Gunter Mussbacher;Omar Alam;Mohammad Alhaj;Shaukat Ali;Nuno Amálio;Balbir Barn;Rolv Bræk;Tony Clark;Benoit Combemale;Luiz Marcio Cysneiros;Urooj Fatima;Robert France;Geri Georg;Jennifer Horkoff;Jörg Kienzle;Julio Cesar Leite;Timothy C. Lethbridge;Markus Luckey;Ana Moreira;Felix Mutz;A. Padua A. Oliveira;Dorina C. Petriu;Matthias Schöttle;Lucy Troup;Vera M. B. Werneck

  • Affiliations:
  • SCE, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada;SCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;SCE, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada;Certus Software V&V Center, Simula Research Laboratory, Norway;LASSY, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg;SEIS, Middlesex University, London, UK;The Norwegian Uni. of Science and Technology, Norway;SEIS, Middlesex University, London, UK;IRISA, Rennes, France;York University, Toronto, Canada;The Norwegian Uni. of Science and Technology, Norway;Colorado State University, Fort Collins;Colorado State University, Fort Collins;DISI, University of Trento, Trento, Italy;SCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO), Brazil;EECS, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada;University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany;Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal;University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany;Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Brazil;SCE, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada;SCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Colorado State University, Fort Collins;Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Brazil

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the CMA 2012 Workshop
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Modeling approaches are based on various paradigms, e.g., aspect-oriented, feature-oriented, object-oriented, and logic-based. Modeling approaches may cover requirements models to low-level design models, are developed for various purposes, use various means of composition, and thus are difficult to compare. However, such comparisons are critical to help practitioners know under which conditions approaches are most applicable, and how they might be successfully generalized and combined to achieve end-to-end methods. This paper reports on work done at the 2nd International Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive modeling methodologies with a particular emphasis on composition: (i) an improved set of comparison criteria; (ii) 19 assessments of modeling approaches based on the comparison criteria and a common, focused case study.