The Pareto Envelope-Based Selection Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation
PPSN VI Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
Multi-objective test problems, linkages, and evolutionary methodologies
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Multiobjective immune algorithm with nondominated neighbor-based selection
Evolutionary Computation
Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Controlling dominance area of solutions and its impact on the performance of MOEAs
EMO'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case studyand the strength Pareto approach
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
RM-MEDA: A Regularity Model-Based Multiobjective Estimation of Distribution Algorithm
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Hi-index | 0.01 |
To extend multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) in higher dimensional objective spaces, this paper proposes a new version of MOEA/D with uniform design, named the uniform design multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (UMOEA/D), and compares the proposed algorithm with MOEA/D and NSGA-II on some scalable test problems with three to five objectives. UMOEA/D adopts the uniform design method to set the aggregation coefficient vectors of the subproblems. Compared with MOEA/D, distribution of the coefficient vectors is more uniform over the design space, and the population size neither increases nonlinearly with the number of objectives nor considers a formulaic setting. The experimental results indicate that UMOEA/D outperforms MOEA/D and NSGA-II on almost all these many-objective test instances, especially on problems with higher dimensional objectives and complicated Pareto set shapes. Experimental results also show that UMOEA/D runs faster than NSGA-II for the problems used in this paper. In additional, the results obtained are very competitive when comparing UMOEA/D with some other algorithm on the multiobjective knapsack problems.