Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms
Evolutionary Computation
Constraint-Handling in Evolutionary Optimization
Constraint-Handling in Evolutionary Optimization
Constraint handling in multiobjective evolutionary optimization
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case studyand the strength Pareto approach
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Self-adaptive fitness formulation for constrained optimization
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We propose a novel constrained MOEA introducing a parents selection based on a two-stage non-dominated sorting of solutions and directed mating in the objective space. In the parents selection, first, we classify the entire population into several fronts by non-dominated sorting based on constraint violation values. Then, we re-classify each obtained front by non-dominated sorting based on objective function values, and select the parents population from upper fronts. The two-stage non-dominated sorting leads to find feasible solutions having better objective function values in the evolutionary process of infeasible solutions. Also, in the directed mating, we select a primary parent from the parents population and pick solutions dominating the primary parent from the entire population including infeasible solutions. Then we select a secondary parent from the picked solutions and apply genetic operators. The directed mating utilizes valuable genetic information of infeasible solutions to enhance convergence of each primary parent toward its search direction in the objective space. We compare the search performance of the two proposed algorithms using greedy selection (GS) and tournament selection (TS) in the directed mating with the conventional CNSGA-II and RTS algorithms on SRN, TNK, OSY and m objectives k knapsacks problems. We show that the proposed algorithms achieve higher search performance than CNSGA-II and RTS on all benchmark problems used in this work.