The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse

Authors:
Ixchel Faniel;Eric Kansa;Sarah Whitcher Kansa;Julianna Barrera-Gomez;Elizabeth Yakel
Affiliations:
OCLC Research, Dublin, OH, USA;University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA;The Alexandria Archive Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA;OCLC Research, Dublin, OH, USA;University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Venue:
Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
Year:
2013

Citing 5
Cited 0

The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata

AI Magazine
The dream of a global knowledge network—A new approach

Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH)
Semantic Interoperability in Archaeological Datasets: Data Mapping and Extraction Via the CIDOC CRM

ECDL '08 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries
Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues' Data

Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Know thy sensor: trust, data quality, and data integrity in scientific digital libraries

ECDL'07 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Field archaeology only recently developed centralized systems for data curation, management, and reuse. Data documentation guidelines, standards, and ontologies have yet to see wide adoption in this discipline. Moreover, repository practices have focused on supporting data collection, deposit, discovery, and access more than data reuse. In this paper we examine the needs of archaeological data reusers, particularly the context they need to understand, verify, and trust data others collect during field studies. We then apply our findings to the existing work on standards development. We find that archaeologists place the most importance on data collection procedures, but the reputation and scholarly affiliation of the archaeologists who conducted the original field studies, the wording and structure of the documentation created during field work, and the repository where the data are housed also inform reuse. While guidelines, standards, and ontologies address some aspects of the context data reusers need, they provide less guidance on others, especially those related to research design. We argue repositories need to address these missing dimensions of context to better support data reuse in archaeology.